Visitors

free counters
Showing posts with label Richard Lovelace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Lovelace. Show all posts

9.24.2019

What do you think?

Greetings All,

     Today I offer you some isolated quotes from four different authors and present them to you with this question: "What do you think?"
     When you read each one what is your initial response?  Do you agree or disagree?  And if so, why?  Are they clear or hard to understand?  I know most everyone is pretty busy, but if you did have a spare moment I would enjoy hearing your thoughts!  And if you do happen to respond, please note which comment you are responding to -- comment #1 by Richard Lovelace, comment #2 by William Carey, comment #3 by John Owen,  or comment #4 B.B. Warfield.  Enjoy.

     “Only a fraction of the present body of professing Christians are solidly appropriating the justifying work of Christ in their lives.  Many have so light an apprehension of God’s holiness and of the extent and guilt of their sin, that consciously they see little need for justification (little need for forgiveness and pardon through the substitutionary work of Jesus), although below the surface of their lives they are deeply guilt-ridden and insecure…  Many have a theoretical commitment to this doctrine [of justification by faith] but in their day-to-day existence they rely on their sanctification for justification, in the Augustinian manner, drawing their assurance of acceptance with God from their sincerity, their past experience of conversion, their recent religious performance, or the relative infrequency of their conscious, willful disobedience.  Few know enough to start each day with a thoroughgoing stand upon Luther’s platform: you are accepted, looking outward in faith and claiming the wholly alien righteousness of Christ as the only ground for acceptance, and relaxing in that quality of trust which will produce increasing sanctification as faith is active in love and gratitude.”                 
Richard Lovelace, “Dynamics of Spiritual Life.”



















     
     
     On his 70th birthday, pioneer missionary William Carey, who translated the whole Bible (or large parts of it) into 23 Indian dialects and Persian; who wrote a Mahratta-English dictionary, a Bengali-English dictionary, a Bhotanta-English dictionary, and a Sanscrit-English dictionary; and who worked tirelessly as a missionary in India for 41 years (between 1792 and 1833) wrote to one of his sons these words:  I am this day 70 years old, a monument of divine mercy and goodness, though on a review of my life I find very much for which I ought to be humbled in the dust. My direct and positive sins are innumerable. My negligence in the Lord's work has been great. I have not promoted His cause nor sought His glory and honor as I ought.  Notwithstanding all of this, I am spared till now and am still retained in His work, and I trust I am received into the divine favor through Him (Christ).” 
William Carey
“Believers obey Christ as the one by whom all their obedience is accepted by God. Believers know all their duties are weak, imperfect and unable to abide in God’s presence. Therefore, they look to Christ as the one who bears the iniquity of their holy things, who adds incense to their prayers, gathers out all the weeds from their duties and makes them acceptable to God... The actual aid and internal operation of the Spirit of God is necessary to produce every holy act of our minds, wills and emotions in every duty whatsoever.  Notwithstanding the power or ability that believers have received by the principle of new life implanted in salvation, they still stand in need of the divine enablement of the Holy Spirit in every single act or duty toward God.”
John Owen
     "It is the conviction that there is nothing in us, or done by us, at any stage of our earthly development which is the cause of our acceptance with God. We must always be accepted for Christ’s sake or we cannot ever be accepted at all. This is not true of us only when we initially believe, it is just as true after we have believed and it will continue to be true as long as we live. Our need of Christ does not cease with our believing, nor does the nature of our relation to Him or to God through Him ever alter regardless of our attainments in Christian graces or our achievements in Christian behavior. It is always on His "blood and righteousness” alone that we can rest. There is never anything that we are or have or do that can take His place or that takes a place along with Him. We are always unworthy, and all that we have or do of good is always of pure grace…  There is emphasized in this attitude the believer's continued sinfulness in fact and in act and his continued sense of his sinfulness. And this carries with it recognition of the necessity of unbroken penitence throughout life. The Christian is conceived fundamentally, in other words, as a penitent sinner.
     We are sinners, and we know ourselves to be sinners, lost and helpless in ourselves. But we are saved sinners, and it is our salvation which gives the tone to our life—a tone of joy which swells in exact proportion to the sense we have of how much we deserve just the opposite.  For it is he to whom much is forgiven who loves much and, who loving, rejoices much.  “It is a great paradox but glorious truth of Christianity,” says Thomas Adams, “that a good conscience may coexist with a consciousness of evil. Though we can have no satisfaction in ourselves, we may have perfect satisfaction in Christ.”
B. B. Warfield





















     
     As I am sure you already know, I am in agreement with all the statements above and believe they accurately reflect the biblical teaching. But if you do not, or feel you would change them in any way, or feel they are out of sync with the message of the Bible I'd love to hear how you disagree or would alter them!

In His Grace, Pastor Jeff 

1.15.2013

Prayer in the Contemporary Church

Greetings All,
    Today's 'thought' has to do with prayer in the contemporary church. It comes from a book entitled: "Dynamics of Spiritual Life -- An Evangelical Theology of Renewal" by Richard Lovelace.
                                       
                         
      The length (435 pages) may turn the disinterested away. But for those truly interested in renewal, or earnestly concerned for the health and well-being of Christ's Church (from a biblical and historical perspective), it contains a wealth of helpful insights and is well worth whatever time it takes to go through the 400+ pages. These insights deal with that all-important practice we call prayer. 

      As Lovelace notes: "Ask Evangelicals what the most essential condition of revival is, and they are most likely to point to prayer... [Yet] in both Evangelical and non-Evangelical circles, the place of prayer has become limited and almost vestigial. The proportion of horizontal communication that goes on in the church (in planning, arguing, and expounding) is overwhelmingly greater than that which is vertical (in worship, thanksgiving, confession and intercession)... The old mid-week prayer meetings for revival have vanished from the programs of most churches, or have been transformed into Bible studies ending with minimal prayer." 
   
      He's right. In fact, I myself have been guilty here -- as are all who plan apart from prayer. Thus I offer his words as an encouragement to all. Enjoy.
      "Why has this [avoidance of earnest prayer for renewal] come about?  Perhaps it stems from the deficient teaching and emphasis on God himself throughout the church, and partly from the man-centeredness of much religious activity.
                                            
            Deficiency in prayer both reflects and reinforces inattention toward God. Then too, the minimal prayer accompanying many projects in the church may indicate that what is being undertaken is simply what human beings can accomplish pretty well by themselves... [This stems from] a failure to comprehend the transforming role the Holy Spirit plays in every redemptive enterprise."
     What is another reason for prayerlessness? Lovelace cites: "Imperfect forms or prayer or models of the Christian life which require superhuman bouts of prayer in order to qualify at an acceptable level of saintliness... In such cases prayer is not an expression of faith in God's grace, but a monument erected to attract his attention. Trust is not centered on the God who constantly oversees our paths and knows our needs, but on prayer itself, which must be used as a magical lever to pry answers from an unwilling God. Since there is a great deal of defective Christianity in existence, it follows that there is plenty of defective prayer, and one generation full of it can produce a succeeding generation which hardly prays at all."
     Likewise: "In small prayer groups, often the concerns which are shared and prayed about are wholly personal, involved with healing, psychological adjustment, and other immediate burdens.  Larger issues which are closely related to the interests of the kingdom of God are ignored. Groups in which this occurs should make a determined effort to engage in kingdom-centered prayer.
                             
        The Lord's Prayer is instructive. It is no accident that it begins first with the worship of God himself, moves on to involve the doing of His will on earth and the coming of his kingdom, and only then turns to the immediate personal concerns of supply, forgiveness and spiritual deliverance."
     How much praying is enough praying? "Just how much intercessory prayer is normative for a Christian lifestyle today? Oddly enough, the Scripture does not seem to recommend the long formal bouts of prayer favored by the desert fathers, some of the monastic writers, and many Puritans. 'Ecclesiastes 5:1-2 says, 'Guard your steps when you go to the house of God. To draw near to listen is better than to offer the sacrifice of fools; for they do not know that they are doing evil. Be not rash with your mouth, nor let your heart be hasty to utter a word before God, for God is in heaven, and you are on earth, therefore let your words be few.' 
      Perhaps Jesus had this passage in mind when he cautioned the disciples, 'Do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do, who think they will be heard for their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father in heaven knows what you need before you ask him' (Mt. 6:7-8)...
     As one Puritan remarked, 'It is best to pray briefly, but often.' A day interwoven with many such prayers may be part of what Paul meant in advising us to 'pray constantly' (I Thess. 5:17)...
                                          
      We might say we have interceded enough when we have held before God the major responsibilities which confront us, and any wider burdens which the Holy Spirit may suggest from day to day -- and have exercised faith that he is at work in these. This is not a difficult labor. There may be times when it can be the work of minutes. Whereas too little prayer is an expression of unbelief in God's love and care; so is too much.
      If all regenerate church members in Western Chritendom were to intercede daily simply for the most obvious spiritual concerns visible in their homes, their workplaces, their local churches and denominations, their nations, and the world (and the total mission of the body of Christ within it), the transformation which would result would be incalculable." 
                                          
             May God pour out such a spirit of prayer upon His Church,  Pastor Jeff